Autonomy (or dependence) of the EU Economy on Critical Services in the Context of the New EU Industrial Policy and Economic Security
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.24.3.42097Keywords:
EU Industrial Policy, servitization, critical services, reindustrialisation, ICT, financial and transport services, economic securityAbstract
The paper addresses the following scientific problem: the autonomy (or dependence) of the EU industry on critical services in the context of reindustrialisation and economic security. Thus, this paper aims to capture the competitive position of critical services from both EU and non-EU origins within the European Single Market, in light of the New EU Industrial Policy and economic security. To this end we analysed 1) changes in rate of provision of critical services in the EU broken down by origin of providers; 2) a share of these services in total international service provision in the EU broken down by origin of providers; 3) competitive position of critical services and its changes in the EU market regarding the origin of the services providers; and finally, 4) competitive and trade positions of EU and non-EU critical services providers. Data on trade in services were obtained from the Eurostat International Trade in Services Database and are presented according to the Eurostat Balance of Payments Services Classification (EBOPS 2010). In order to identify the position of the EU and non-EU critical service providers to the European Union’s companies, we employ two specialisation measures commonly used in the trade literature - the Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage (RSCA) and the Trade Balance Index (TBI). The combination of the two indicators was visualised using the matrix proposed by Widodo adjusted to the aim of this research. In the first part of the paper, a literature review is presented, followed by a statistical analysis of trade and competitive positions of EU and non-EU critical services providers. The discussion, which is rather limited due to the small number of publications dealing with the problem raised, is presented. Finally, the paper ends with conclusions, policy recommendations and directions of further research. Our research allowed to state that the competitive position of critical services of EU providers is higher within the European Single Market in comparison to non-EU providers. This leads au to a conclusion that the EU maintains some level of autonomy in critical services and strengthened it over the last fifteen years (2010-2024).
References
Aiginger, K. & Rodrik, D. (2020). The Rebirth of Industrial Policy: Reasons and Open Questions. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 20, pp. 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00322-3
Ambroziak, A.A. & Stefaniak, J. (2022). The Position of China in Trade in Services within the European Union. Oeconomia Copernicana, vol. 13(2), pp. 335-343. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.010
Ambroziak, A.A. (Ed.) (2017). New Industrial Policy of the European Union. Switzerland: Springer.
Ambroziak, A.A. (Ed.) (2020). New Challenges for the European Union’s Industrial Policy: climate change, servitisation, digitalisation. Warsaw: SGH Publishing House.
Baines, T.S., Lightfoot, H.W., Benedettini, O. & Kay, J.M. (2009). The Servitization of Manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 20(5), pp. 547-567.
Baines, T.S., Lightfoot, H.W., Evans, S., Neely, A., Greenough, R., Peppard, J., Roy, R., Shehab, E., Braganza, A., Tiwari, A., Alcock, J.R., Angus, J.P., Bastl, M., Cousens, A., Irving, P., Johnson, M., Kingston, J., Lockett, H., Martinez, V., Michele, P., Tranfield, D., Walton, I.M. & Wilson, H. (2007). State-of-the-Art in Product-Service Systems. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 221(10), pp. 1543-1552.
Beath, J. (2002). UK Industrial Policy: Old Tunes on New Instruments? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 18, no. 2.
Darnis, J.P. (2021). The European Union between Strategic Autonomy and Technological Sovereignty: Impasses and Opportunities. Recherches & Documents, no. 10.
Erixon, F., Guinea, O., & Pandya, D. (2024, December). Securing Europe’s Future: Strengthening ICT Competitiveness for Economic and National Security (ECIPE Policy Brief No. 22/2024). European Centre for International Political Economy.
European Commission (2022) EU Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe's recovery. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/951377
European Commission (2023a). Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council on “European Economic Security Strategy”.
European Commission. (2023b). Single Market and reindustrialisation: Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/858009
European Parliament. (2020). Transport and the Single Market. Briefing by the Directorate-General for Internal Policies https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652040/IPOL_BRI(2020)652040_EN.pdf
Graham, H. (1986). European Industrial Policy. London: Croom Helm.
Juhász, R., Lane, N. & Rodrik, D. (2024). The New Economics of Industrial Policy. Annual Review of Economics, vol. 16, pp. 213-242. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081023-024638
Krugman, P. & Obstfeld, M. (2009). International Economics: Theory and Policy, 7th ed. New York: Pearson-Addison Wesley.
Lightfoot, H., Baines, T. & Smart, P. (2013). The Servitization of Manufacturing: A Systematic Literature Review of Interdependent Trends. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 33(11/12), pp. 1408-1434.
Ochman, J. & Biziewski, J. (2020). European Union’s Strategic Autonomy, in Ramírez, J.M. & Biziewski, J. (Eds.), A Shift in the Security Paradigm. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications, pp. 245-258. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43253-9_12
OECD (1975). Objectives and Instruments of Industrial Policy: A Comparative Study. Paris: OECD.
Pitelis, C.N. (2006). Industrial Policy: Perspectives, Experience, Issues, in Bianchi, P. & Labory, S. (Eds.), International Handbook on Industrial Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Rodrik, D. (2022). An Industrial Policy for Good Jobs. Policy Proposal. The Hamilton Project, Brookings.
Saggi, K. & Pack, H. (2006). Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey. The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 21(2).
Schmenner, R.W. (2009). Manufacturing, Service, and Their Integration: Some History and Theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 29(5), pp. 431-443.
Stefaniak, J. & Ambroziak, A.A. (2017). "Pakiet usługowy" Komisji Europejskiej – remedium na bariery na unijnym rynku usług? Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, vol. 487, pp. 306-317. ISSN: 1899-3192.
Stefaniak, J. & Ambroziak, A.A. (2021). Intra-EU vs. Extra-EU Trade in ICT Services. International Journal of Management and Economics, vol. 57(1), pp. 34-43. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2021-0001
Stefaniak J. (2019). Liberalizacja swobody przepływu usług a międzynarodowy handel usługami w Unii Europejskiej: wymiana wewnątrzunijna a handel zewnętrzny (Liberalisation of the freedom to provide services and international trade in services in the European Union: intra-EU exchange versus external trade). Studia Europejskie. Vol. 23, pp. 91–107. doi:10.33067/SE.2.2019.5
Stefaniak J. (2024). Uwarunkowania przepływów usług biznesowych na rynku wewnętrznym Unii Europejskiej. (Determinants of business services flows in the Internal Market of the European Union). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
Schmitz, L., Seidl, T., & Wuttke, T. (2025). The costs of conditionality. IPCEIs and the constrained politics of EU industrial policy. Competition & Change, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251320675
Vandermerwe, S. & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of Business: Adding Value by Adding Services. European Management Journal, vol. 6(4), pp. 314-324.
